| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |
Mister McDerp
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
21
   |
Posted - 2013.10.17 18:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
Brienna Torsti wrote:I'm going to have so much fun spamming these around regions.
It's going to be great. Anchor them, forget about them, annoy someone somewhere who's doing a 1 man operation.
Minimum effort griefing.
But please, CCP. The API is utterly ****** as it is... Fix it before breaking it on purpose.
First that. Screwing with the API like that is... a bad direction to take.
And second, also that. it WILL be used as a griefing tool on the small guys trying to do reactions and nothing else. Enjoy your even emptier lowsec.
Marlona Sky wrote:Loving all these afk pos owner tears in this thread. God forbid you actually need to spend more than 3 minutes a week fueling and grabbing goo right?
You have no idea how much of a pain running multiple reaction posses already is, do you? Like literally: Most People bragging about how they're doing PI make more money with less effort, less risk. The only thing they need is more characters. |
Mister McDerp
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 19:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
Solution to part of the crying is simple. Make it so it actually just affect moonharvesters. People that sit on worthless moons won't care much and people that have moons worth it are at least actually big or at least powerful alliances. |
Mister McDerp
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 20:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Mister McDerp wrote:Solution to part of the crying is simple. Make it so it actually just affect moonharvesters. People that sit on worthless moons won't care much and people that have moons worth it are at least actually big or at least powerful alliances. hahaha you have no idea why people are saying this is a bad feature do you.
I'm running POS's myself, I'm pretty sure I know exactly why its terrible.
I should have probably said it different. But I'm too lazy to actually do that... urgh.
Well I said it would be a solution to PART of the crying (mine for example, i wouldn't care much). It really wouldn't be good solution though, I'll admit to that.
A good solution would be a complete POS revamp without making lives of people tending to them even more miserable. A lot of suggestions have been made here how a Siphon Module could be implemented in a meaningful way with that.
But we all know thats not gonna happen soon. |
Mister McDerp
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
23
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
Which is imho the worst about all of this.
Literally so badly thought out they have to make the API scew us over |
Mister McDerp
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
24
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kat Aclysm made pretty good suggestions how this module could not be total crap |
Mister McDerp
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
24
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 16:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
Herr Esiq wrote:It would be tedious if i see my sihphon units removed constantly..
It would be tedious if i see my reactions shut down constantly
also more expensive |
Mister McDerp
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
26
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 13:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
Rakshasa Taisab wrote:Dagda Morr wrote:Rakshasa Taisab wrote:You can't siphon from complex reaction arrays... The simple reactants have to come from somewhere...... Only endpoints can be siphoned, so just do the simple reaction as an input to the complex, nothing will be stolen.
Fairly sure that is wrong, it will steal from the simple reaction as it is "unloading" into the silo. |
| |
|